After nearly every superintendent conference day in my district, the committee in charge of coordinating professional development asks the faculty to respond to a survey about the effectiveness of the time spent that day. Each time there is a field for, “suggestions for future superintendent days”. My perennial suggestion to the Prof Dev Committee is to offer lab time to department based groups to collaborate on researching resources available on the internet to use in the classroom: online textbook resources, videos from educational resources such as united streaming, WGBH or even you-tube, teacher generated materials, etc. As a French teacher I am constantly looking for authentic “realia” from the internet to use in the classroom: menus from actual cafes, train schedules to teach time, weather reports around the world, etc.
I am fortunate to work in a district that supports technology. Every classroom in my school has an interactive Smartboard. More importantly than merely having the technology, the district supports the investments it makes: training is extensive, turnaround on repairs is impressive, there are opportunities to pilot new technologies, etc. However, from a teacher perspective it is difficult to find the time to adapt our curriculum to the emerging technology and to really exploit all the new technology we have. Therefore why not pool our resources as a department and work together to share what we have indivually stumbled upon amidst the seemingly boundless resources of the internet.
Which leads me to another thought: although my proposal is thoughtful and useful, is this really the best allocation of our Prof Dev time? For the same reason that we wouldn’t use our time to write a textbook, why shouldn’t we outsource this service? And why are textbook publishers so antiquated that they haven’t come up with this idea themselves yet?
As a middle school French teacher I use a textbook as a skeleton for my instruction. It provides useful guidance in terms of marrying vocabulary with grammar points, offers reference materials for students and provides resources such as assessments and workbook activities as well as audio and video resources. Many of these resources can be accessed through the online edition. I use these resources to inform my instruction, I pick and choose what I find helpful, integrate other sources and combine it all with materials I develop on my own.
Imagine a textbook publisher that offered the basic resources listed above but went further and acted as a agregator for other resources available on the internet and organized it in a way that would be useful to teachers. Perhaps it could develop and maintain a wiki for example, based on my French intermediate level textbook, that permitted all subscribers access to the wiki to link resources, provide lesson ideas and update information.
Publishers typically would sell textbooks to districts with the intention that each student would take home a textbook. Oh the backpacks! I wouldn’t kill the textbook entirely, and can imagine the usefulness of purchasing a scaled-down set of textbooks to keep in the classroom as reference on basic skeletal points: grammar rules, vocabulary lists, verb conjugations, etc. The money saved on the extreme cost of paper and printing could be reallocated to the development and maintenance of much broader online resources including links to videos, online realia, student generated work, teacher generated resources, Smartboard resources, etc. The publishers could go even further and create a living textbook with a real person as a “guide” along the model of about.com. In addition to making contributions, subscribers could pose questions or make requests to the “guide”. This concept marries the broad contributions of the wiki with the customized service of a responsive provider. The benefit that the publisher could offer its clients would be to organize, vet and feed this information to it’s subscribers.